an open curtain with a dead body behind it

I pulled another book out of my to-read pile – The Open Curtain, by Brian Evenson - and finished it late last night. Imagine my surprise when there was a comment by George Saunders on the back…coincidences are weird, sometimes.

I have to say that this is a major case where the blurb on the back of the book seemed to have little or no relation to the inside of the book. (Who writes those, anyway?) The plot is a slowly-unraveling type of plot with mystery-like edges, so perhaps they didn’t want to ruin the story for readers. Still, I feel the quote from Bradford Morrow below the blurb summarizes the content much better: “[f]amily, secrecy, truth, anger, history, the desire to belong, the need to discover oneself…”

The protagonist is Rudd, a Mormon teenager in Utah who has problems with every single one of the above. The narrative begins as he finds letters from a mysterious woman to his dead father, who claims she’s had his child. Rudd finds and sort of befriends his half-brother Lael. At school, Rudd starts writing a research paper about how the founder of the Mormon church’s grandson murdered a woman in New York. Lael seems to be extremely violent, then there’s Rudd’s crazy and mean mother, then Rudd nearly gets murdered…for you action lovers, there’s a lot of that.

The plot construction is so careful: Evenson places just the right amount of clues to let you know if you’re looking that there’s something going on with Rudd, and changes the point-of-view to recently orphaned Lyndi at just the right time. The third section features the point of view of Joseph Smith’s confused grandson wandering New York after his murder of Anna Pulitzer. Small details (I don’t want to ruin it for you) and the labeling of three consecutive chapters as chapter one let the reader know that again, your point of view character is misleading you or himself mislead.

I found the author’s note at the end of the book fascinating: I figured the book was fiction, but I didn’t know that the Mormon church did have secret rituals that used to include the miming of violence. The author explains that when he started the book, he was Mormon, but because of the reception of his previous book (which was also about less savory parts of Mormonism, I figure) and other factors he asked to be excommunicated. The repressed violence and rumored early violence in Mormonism, mostly referenced in the book through the shadowy practice of “blood atonement,” clearly disturbs him in his author’s note. I felt, though, that he handled the issue with a lot of sensitivity.

While Mormon theology influenced the book’s violent events, I didn’t read it as a situation where you could directly say “The Mormon religion is directly to blame for this!” Perhaps Evenson still feels some compassion for his old religion, or perhaps he meant to not point fingers, or both. Rudd and Lyndi both have problems they have to face, and their surroundings and family (including Lyndi’s aunt who is not Mormon) don’t help them face those problems in the way they should. Lyndi, in particular, makes bad decisions all by herself. The moral ambiguity makes the book stronger and more like the ambiguity of real life. Obviously there are writers that point fingers and have strong attacks on people or institutions – in satire, for example – but most non-satirical fiction has to keep that ambiguity to be successful. I can’t think of any that haven’t, actually, but you’re welcome to correct me.

In Persuasion Nation

The birds are chirping, the flowers are blooming, the sun is shining, and the Julias are blogging. I know you are thinking I am crazy for being inside on such a wonderful day, but I just could not resist the urge to get the word out on a new book I just finished reading. The book is In Persuasion Nation, by George Saunders and holy shit it is good. I finished the whole thing in one day and you need to read it! I don’t know how to say this without sounding like a dramatic and hyper school girl, but this book is not only good, it is important.

The book is a collection of his newest short stories and each one is genius without exception. The work is mostly satire? But I’m not sure if the work is angry enough to be considered satirical. Because in every piece there is something inherently good going on in an inherently bad world. It is obvious that Saunders has a major beef with conformity and pop-culture (he exaggerates each to such an extreme it almost feels like sci-fi) but he does it in such an unexpected way. He does it mostly through language itself.

My favorite story in the book is the one that is most language intensive. Jon is about a young man who is a kind of human database/model of commercialism and consumerism. He lives inside a warehouse with other models like him and they have an expansive knowledge of every commercial ever made. All of the models are unusually stupid and naïve and are under the care of bosses who are like family. However, it is because of the language that the stupidity and naivety comes across and what makes the piece so successful and unique. Jon says in the story, “I had a look, and tell the truth it did not look that good, such as the Rustic Village Apartments, out of which every morning these bummed-out-looking guys in the plainest non-designer clothes ever would trudge out and get in their junky cars. And was someone joyfully kissing them goodbye, like saying when you come home tonight you will get a big treat, which is me? No.” The bizarreness of the language instantly grips me from the beginning. I don’t think I would have even needed a plot to love the story.

I have some experience with language based poetry…but very little with language based fiction. Saunders seems to be creating a new kind of language for each story and the needs of that story’s plot…and the result is mesmerizing. The work almost takes on a poetic feel because of the bizarre nature of the language. Are a lot of authors taking this language based approach to fiction now? I guess this work just got me confused over what direction fiction is heading. I wrote an old post about what fiction should be doing…and I said it partly needs to be doing something fresh and new. Well Saunders is certainly doing that and his work is precisely what I hope for when picking up new fiction.

In Persuasion Nation was one of three finalists for the 2006 Story Prize for best short story collection of the year. And I cannot wait to see what kind of work Saunders produces in the future.

Flash Flash Flash

I finally got out of the house and library the other day. One of my old friends knew about a reading at a college that is somewhat local but a little out of the way. The undergraduate literary magazine put on a flash fiction fest. I have to say I was slightly disappointed, the faculty member that was suppose to read happened to be sick and couldn’t make it. It seemed they were in need of more readers, asking other to get up and speak before the three winners read their work. The first two readers (whose names I can not remember) had some very nice work to share. I especially liked the second reader. Her work was descriptive and vivid. It was a piece that I can only sum up about heritage and about looking for that, using language itself as a way to show and find what heritage means.

When we finally saw the fiction winners I was again disappointed. The third place winner had an excellent story however his voice was slightly hard to hear. The second place winner had, in my humble opinion, the best story of the three. His was descriptive and honest. His voice was the most audible and he seemed to have experience speaking in public. The first place winner was of all the readers the worst speaker. I felt that actually reading the story myself would have produced a better outcome, however the speaker was trying to act out the arrogance (at least I hope act out) of the narrator and stumbled over his words. He also seemed uncomfortable at the front of the room. Either way it was nice to see what college students are writing these days, and this reading showed a large array of what college students think and how they write. I guess this reading was just an example that writing is not just about actually sitting down somewhere and creating something but also how one presents this is important as well.

Cross Connect

Once again I have continued my quest to broaden my literary horizons and set out into the wild blue of online literature. Jumping from site to site, I came across this online magazine that claimed to publish not only both poetry and fiction but also pieces of visual art. The e-zine is called Cross Connect (http://ccat.sas.upenn.edu/~xconnect/). I checked out it's about xconnect link and read the following: "With this issue, the ninth Web issue of Xconnect, we conclude our third year of life -- we can't help but pause -- collectively. In reflection, we can almost fall backward toward our founding inspiration -- to create a new outlet for writers. One, which would acknowledge the vast expanse of disciplines, from experimental to works well rooted in our own discoveries." This last little bit I found interesting. Many magazines nowadays, at least from the meager amount that I have read, seem to be adopting the idea of accepting everyone no matter how experimental or conservative your work may be. I've also noticed that many of these magazines don't really live up to their own hype. In this case, I'll let you be the judge.
While reading through the works, I found a couple of different poems that did seem to be radically different, as far as their structure at least. One of the poems was "Nights in a Time of War", by Lyn Hejinian. It definitely plays with lines and spacing, in a way that many of the other works did not. I can't really cut and paste it here and keep the same spacings, so here is a link to it: http://ccat.sas.upenn.edu/xconnect/i25/g/hejinian.html . I'm really glad that people are attempting to cover a more broad range in work nowadays. At least it gives people like me the opportunity to experience different types works without having to go all over the place.

New Outlook on Poetry!?!

How do we consider what we consider to be poetry? Of course another lonely Friday night that I have been surfing the lonely web. (I really need to find a life!) I just came across another new blogging spot that I have found very intriguing and it caught my eye immediately. Now What blog spot just caught my attention and said "Read Me!" I am not sure if I am just losing my mind or what, but I found some great "poetry" that just mad me say WOW! For the particular part that I thought was great was that of a Reading Review of the Mad Hatter's. They talked about what the organization was about and the actual people that read, then it posted some of the author's work.

That is when I began to ask myself the question, what is poetry, and where is the line drawn when it comes to the extreme? I have been exposed to so many different types of poems, prose and of course the fiction/non-fiction aspects of creative writing in the last year or so, I just think it is absolutely amazing. There are so many communities that exist out in this big world we live in today. But who sits out there and classifies what is actually poetry, or whatever the writing may be? I just think that this catagory is growing and when/if will it ever stop?

Anyway back to the blog. The Mad Hatters' reading seemed so interesting and the blog went on to give a background on the particular authors that are a part of the association. I really enjoyed the work that they posted to the blog site. Of the ones listed, Gunnar Benediktsson's Symbiotic Architectures was my favorite. The picture is of crosses some large and others are smaller, or in the background. I just think this artwork says so much without saying anything at all, at least with words. Many days I feel that our days consist of saying so much that is either irrelavant or just completely ridiculous. In many instances we could go days without saying anything that is of essence. With this poetry that was listed I feel that it is evermore saying to me that we don't need to speak words, we can just get by on actions and seeing things in broader occasions.

For me and many other people it seems that writing is an outlet from the "real world" and with so many different genres of creative writing out in this place we live anyone can seem to fit in. What we consider is poetry someone else may think it is crap, but from my experience, every symbol or word may contain the right message to catch my attention and say exactly what I am feeling. Too extreme may only come if you, personally don't connect with the piece, but someelse may so it obviously isn't too extreme for them. Until someone can pinpoint those limits I will enjoy so an excentric and collective options of poetry that is out in the world around.

Form and function: casual, funny, and fabulous

I know that I work in the library and everything, and that I have direct access to actual books, but I am just so enthralled with online reading! There are so many inventive and enjoyable things out there, and I don’t have to move anything but one finger to read them! No more walking to those shelves a whole twenty steps away.

My latest love is McSweeney’s, http://www.mcsweeneys.net/ . It is absolutely hilarious and wonderfully clever. You, yes, any reader that you may happen to be, should check it out if you never have. The magazine describes itself as follows:

“Timothy McSweeney’s Internet Tendency is an offshoot of Timothy McSeeney’s Quarterly Concern, a journal created by nervous people in relative obscurity, and published four times a year.”

As you may even be able to tell from this description, they have a completely real, witty, and laid-back style—something very refreshing for a literary magazine. I feel too often that literary magazines are dreadfully serious. I suppose there is certainly a place for that, so I won’t bash it, but the comic relief is, hah, a relief (I know, I’m not funny). For example, here is a sample from the page that is about Mcsweeney’s which explaining the frequency of posting on the site. Even the explanations are casual and hilarious, but not at all unprofessional or obnoxious. They write,

“We will put some things "up," so to speak, on some days, and on other days, we will not put things up. Whether or not we put things up will depend largely on whether, on a particular day, we have anything to put up. For example, let's say that on Monday we have something which we want to put up. On that day, we will put that thing up. On Tuesday, though, we might not have anything to put up. We will worry for a moment about not having anything to put up. "Oh no," we might say, "another day has come, and we have nothing to put up. What will happen if someone visits this site and there is nothing new to look at? Will people be angry?" But then we will realize that, chances are, people will not be angry -- that, chances are, people will understand. Most people are pretty understanding.”


I felt like I should quote that in full because it is just that funny, and probably more worth your reading than what I myself am writing right now. Hope you enjoyed.

With those examples laying the groundwork, let me explain a little more about what I encountered when I first went to this site, and why I love it so. First, I noticed the clean style—very post-modern in appearance. There were no cheap gimmicks, or anything flashy—the text presented was going to have to stand on its own as interesting. And it certainly did. The first words I read, other than the title of the page, were, “You are inappropriate, and the Pope is here to help. His book How to Dress for Every Occasion provides vital tips on clothing oneself for the beach, the movies, even air travel. Half price for the next 24 hours!” It appears to be an ad for a book—what I can only hope is either a fake book or the most hilarious joke of a book. You can click on the link to a page of further description and advertisement. As I continued to read through the site, I felt myself becoming more and more at ease myself, and more and more fascinated with what the next clever piece would be. Rarely do I come across such funny work, and so much of it in the same place! I feel like I have found a reliable source, here, for smart humor.

Also, I love that this site is so easy to navigate. There is little frivolous fluff or many distractions on the page. You can basically just click your way through the long archive list of postings. Most pieces are a wonderful length, too—I can read each in about five minutes. This is perfect for when a reader just wants to go and enjoy something for perhaps only a few moments (i.e. when I am working the circulation desk and am left alone for a few minutes with nothing pressing to do). The material and format match each other, neither being too complicated, heavy, or emotional in nature as many literary journals are. Many online journals leave me feeling lost behind or scattered, despite their serious efforts at being…serious. Sometimes it’s hard to tell where to even click next on an online journal. McSweeney’s is clear and approachable, and the content equally pleasing. Whether the writer is writing about JCrew or how to tell Jesus from the Antichrist, this work is casual and fun, and also is presented in a way in line with its demeanor.

I am apparently a huge fan!

Not so Big and Ugly

So I got bored the other day and started searching for online magazines. I found quite a few, but one jumped out at me more than the others. It could be because the website is bright green and pink. It’s ‘The Big Ugly Review’, which seems to have something for just about everyone. The completely online magazine is put out twice a year, every issue having a theme. It’s really easy to go from the current issue to the past ones, plus you aren’t distracted by annoying advertisements.
The Big Ugly Review publishes not only fiction, nonfiction and poetry, but also film and music. Short films can be submitted and viewed on the site, which I thought was pretty cool. The themed idea was nice, as it links all the genres together. I liked how it brought lots of different communities to one site.
I looked at ‘The Contest’ issue of the magazine. I began perusing the fiction section, reading stories by authors I hadn’t heard of before. Since this was the contest issue, the pieces didn’t connect to one another, but they were still well written. One story I liked was ‘Road Trip’ by Nina Schuyler. The story showed the struggle between desires, those of the parents and child while on a road trip. The mom is convinced they don’t have enough water for the trip through the desert, becoming paranoid when they stop to get more, only to find there isn’t any in any gas station they find. The dad is set on attending his 92nd birthday, and the child won’t stop crying. It was an interesting look at how different people deal with 13 hour drives, which I remember from old family vacations. And if you don’t like long fiction, they have some flash fiction you can check out.
Anyway, I didn’t think the name fit the magazine, though it does stick in your head. I liked having lots of options to look at. I even signed up for the mailing list, so when a new issue comes out, I’ll get an e-mail. I’m always looking for new ways to fill up my time. Anyone know some other magazines like this one?

A Million Little Pieces

Typically, I find myself avoiding books that Oprah recommended through her book club. However, I did break down and read A Million Little Pieces by James Frey, primarily because of the controversy surrounding its classification as a memoir. I must admit, initially the book was difficult to get into. It is incredibly graphic; so much so that I found myself cringing as I read and wondering what those around me thought of my silent reaction. Typically, I find reading to be an enjoyable activity and I think I put off reading this book for so long because I’d seen others reading it, making the same cringing reaction. I wonder, do others find themselves turning to reading to provide enjoyment and shying from books that make them hurt or afraid? (I must admit, I’m a pretty big wuss when it comes to horror films too; there might be some kind of a connection here.)

However, I stuck with the book and eventually found myself quite immersed and rooting for James’ recovery. (He is checked into a drug and alcohol rehab center and told that he has abused his body to the point at which if he drinks or does drugs ever again it will kill him. The book focuses on his time in rehab; the friends he makes and their struggles and his dismissal of the AA’s 12 steps program.) As James began to recover the descriptions became less graphic, but the book did keep a very somber tone, in line with the belief that only 15% of the people treated at the center he was at would survive without relapsing. The book focused less on bleeding gashes and root canals without painkillers as it continued, and then discussed implications of betrayal and the effects of alcoholism on spouses, children, parents and friends. Reading the book was a definite eye opener.

Still, I must admit I do feel cheated a bit now that it’s common knowledge that James Frey embellished some of the truth in the writing of A Million Little Pieces. Throughout the book I found myself wondering what was truth and what was fiction. I asked a friend and her belief was that Frey embellished the graphic details of his condition when he was checked into the clinic that made the reader cringe. After some research online, I found that it was his criminal records and run-ins with the law that were embellished. Regardless, it makes me wonder what the intended effect was of stretching the truth. To some extent, I think all writers must do this in their writing, even if there is only a glimmer of truth in the finished piece because I believe we all write about what we know. Why do you think Frey (or authors in general) choose to exaggerate? Does it sell better? Essentially, the problem was that Frey claimed his book to be completely nonfiction when in fact, it was not. Do memoirs sell better than novels? Should there be a degree to which an author can claim artistic licensure?

Romping in the Bookish Dark

Once again while “hard at work” in the Library I came across a new-ish book of poetry that caught my eye, Mark Strand’s Man and Camel (2006). I was drawn to it both because it is a bright orange book (what could make a girl’s day brighter in the gloomy Ohio weather) and because I remembered liking some of Strand’s earlier work that I had been exposed to in high school and college, especially “Eating Poetry” and “The New Poetry Handbook.” Along with Man and Camel I also checked out Darker (1970) for comparison/refreshment and also my general distraction.

While I really liked several of the poems from Darker—especially “The Prediction,” “From a Litany” and “Elegy 1969”—the general tone of the collection seemed really dark and often helpless or at the mercy of fate, with death as a frequent element in the poems. I guess this shouldn’t have been too surprising given the title of the collection.

I spent more time with the new kid on the block, Man and Camel, however. While they are still similar to Strand’s earlier work as I experienced it in Darker, the tone has shifted and I got a very different feeling from reading this recent collection. The book is divided into three sections, and the final section is a single series of seven poems titled “Poem After the Last Seven Words.” This particular piece is interesting in that it takes on Biblical/scriptural elements quite directly, unlike other Strand poems that I have read.

For the most part, Strand’s poetry seemed to be largely narrative, and he often uses small stories in conjunction with reflections in the poems of this collection. Strand also uses a fair amount of repetition in these poems; one in particular struck me, as it repeated the same stanza twice in the format of a series.

“Elevator”
I.
The elevator went to the basement. The doors opened.
A man stepped in and asked if I was going up.
“I’m going down,” I said. “I won’t be going up.”
II.
The elevator went to the basement. The doors opened.
A man stepped in and asked if I was going up.
“I’m going down,” I said. “I won’t be going up.”

This duplication was intriguing to me; it feels as though the speaker has been standing at this elevator for a long time, answering this same question over and over in the same way. Both this repetition and the narrative style were things that I recognized from reading Strand’s earlier work, but there were some other characteristics to this collection that also stood out to me.

In the first section (called “one,” unassumingly enough), many poems, including the first few, “The King” and “Two Horses” among them, have dream-like qualities to them. The poems seem to be affected by age, that is, the speaker/Strand generally feels wise or at times world weary. One place where I noticed this was the appearance of death as a character in some of the poems. Unlike in earlier poems, death does not come from some dreamed up tragic fantasy situation, but it waits quietly for its natural place to intervene, as in “2002.” I also noticed themes relating to memory, regret, and the pull of fate. In part two, I noticed more attention to personal relationships, small portraits of people, a lot of moon imagery, and a feeling of greater distance from some of the subjects of the poems, as well as a greater distance from tragedy. For example, in “People Walking through the Night,” the subject (the people walking like refugees to sleep homeless in a park) are “they” unlike the “we” of earlier poems. Also, in “Marsyas,” “screams could be heard” of a “man tearing open his body,” but “nobody spoke” or took action, including the narrator.

I like this collection quite a bit; I found Strand’s poems to be both accessible and complex. While their narrative quality makes them easy to read, there is clearly something significant going on beyond the words on the page. In some ways, I felt that Strand’s earlier work (or at least the pieces that I read) resonated more with me, but perhaps I just need to spend a little more time with these new pieces.

Good stuff in the middle of hokey stuff

I was at the grocery store the other day picking up a prescription and had to wait about 20 minutes so I was looking at the magazines they had and I picked up Realms of Fantasy Magazine. At first I thought it was just something that was for die hard Harry Potter fans and Eragon nuts but I was surprised to see that there were a few good short stories. And the best thing about it was that they were all varied and not what I was expecting. Half of the stories I read through were actually science fiction stories. I asked Clyde, my guru of all things fantasy, about it and he actually had a few old issues that he let me borrow to look at. I think the thing that I actually like about this magazine is that it offers a way for the common person to get into a writing market. I’m not saying that any person who writes a story is going to be published in the magazine, far from it, most of what I read was very good writing, some of it’s by established writers who get featured in each issue but with my experience so far with literary magazines and journals it does seem a bit stuffy and at times on the artsy side, so I think that its important for more than just literature readers to do the writings, who’s to say that someone brand new and inexperienced can’t have a good idea for a story. Also, we all have to start somewhere, and this magazine seems like as good a place as any. Other than about a dozen short stories, which included tales of deep space, quirky realities where robots run around, tales of biblical fiction and stories about anything you can imagine, there were also good articles on work coming out in all media from print, to film, to video games. There was a lot of hokey stuff too, gothic dresses, places you could buy swords and medieval weapons, and lots of propaganda for Eragon and Harry Potter stuff, but I would still give the magazine some credibility after what I read. Just because it’s common or in the main stream I don’t think it should be count out.

Spanish poetry + English + Music = Delight. Who knew?

I stumbled upon a gem of a reading the other night. It was on Wednesday night, March 7 at Miami University. María Auxiliadora Alvarez, a Spanish professor and old family friend, read a selection of her Spanish poetry. This was a surprisingly stacked show, as her English translator, Dr. Linde M. Brocato, had traveled from the University of Illinois to read with her, as had a world-renowned composer and Professor of Music at St. Mary’s College, Jeffrey Jacob. The lucky audience was privileged to hear María read her work in Spanish, the translator following, and then Jeffrey Jacob, speaking on how he put this poetry to music. The prestigious St. Petersburg philharmonic choir and orchestra preformed his scores, I believe it was, and Mr. Jacob showed video recordings of these shows as part of his presentation. It was fascinating to see how these three artists come together to make this wonderful poetry and music (the work is in progress), each explaining a bit about his or her approach and experience along with the actual performance of the work. I loved the opportunity to explore the intersection of poetry and music, and how the two work together to heighten the other.
Also, speaking both English and Spanish (I traveled to Guatemala once upon a time and spent some time there learning the language), it was enjoyable for me to hear María’s Spanish poetry as compared with the English translations. The translator did a wonderful job of picking very specific words and phrasings that I would not have immediately thought of, but that deal well with the subtleties of the text. For instance, compare these two versions of the same stanza of “We”/”Nosotros”:

“accederíamos con lágrimas
a los labios promisorios
alcanzaríamos con risas
la mudez final”

“we would endorse with tears
the promissory lips
with laughter we would arrive
at the final loss of voice”

In the final line, there is nothing to indicate “voice” specifically in the Spanish, but more literally, just a final silence or muteness. The use of “final loss of voice” in English adds a delicacy, however, that I think Alvarez intended. It is beautiful and poignant work on both of their parts.
I was further amazed by the work of Jeffrey Jacob, and not just because of his extraordinary record of accomplishments, but because of his explanations and the beauty of the music itself. The pieces he composed were intricate and had intentional effects meant to enhance the poetry. He explained that some composers will take the piece of poetry as a whole and compose to that, but that he prefers to take a few lines as his primary inspiration and work to shape the music around them. He tries to give a beautiful sound and color to the text. For example, he explained and played while playing the piano to illustrate, he will use a certain underlying chord for a long period to create a sense of timelessness. In more specific examples, he discussed María’s poem, “The infinite”, or “El infinito”, and how he worked with the text. There is a sense of desperation in the beginning, and so he uses loud and passionate music. Then, as the piece moves towards tranquility in the end, he uses the same tempo and themes, but it is slower and a bit quieter, like a memory. When he showed a performance of this piece, it seemed almost discordant in the beginning, moving toward harmonic in the end. In another example, the music accompanying “The eternal apprentice” seems very improvisatory and has no consistent pulse. The final piece, which I would call the ultimate and most awe-inspiring piece, was very beautiful. Jacob commented that “We”, or “Nosotros”, is very personal and introspective, but also very soaring and romantic (the above quotation is the ending of this poem). So then, he worked on creating both intimacy and a sense of extroverted and glowing horizons in the music. I noticed that the cello and women’s chorus combine in a beautiful harmony to illicit both the personal introspection and the extroverted or passionate angels of the poem.
Maria was always very personal when introducing each of her pieces, telling us a bit about each one. Many of them were written for one of her children. It was fascinating to me that a poem about a shattered heart could be for her son, and I loved that she was that honest—both with him and with us. Also, I loved to imagine what Maria was thinking and feeling as she heard her work in English, a language which she speaks at a fairly elementary level. How is it to trust your poetry with someone else to become something different from the personal work you had poured your own heart into? Such trust! Further, though, what is it like to hear something with so many personal memories, thoughts, and feelings, put to its own music? I think it would be reminiscent of having a personal soundtrack to your life! It would be extremely moving for the writer. I also wonder how great it was for the three of them to see an audience moved by the work—as we all were. It was absolutely beautiful—in English, in Spanish, and in pure music.

look ma, they've got pictures

We don’t get too many graphic novels at my library, and it’s kinda hard to know what’s good to buy or even request off interlibrary loan since: comic book stores scare me a little (they shouldn’t, but they do) and not too many print people are willing to admit there might be something to look at in some of these books. So I go to my old friend The Internet.

Graphic Novel Review is one good blog to look at, though it hasn’t been updated in a while: the blog is set up for reviews, obviously, but there’s often commentary about genre expectation as well. The first post starts off discussing how most people who read comics expect elements of the supernatural, the fantastical, and the just plain weird. Unless one’s reading Japanese comics, of course, but see below for that discussion. GNR also links to what other people are saying about graphic novels they’re reviewed, which is pretty cool: you can see other opinions. La Perdida and De: Tales look pretty interesting to me.

I guess the other downside is that GNR almost excludes what’s virtually eating up the comics market right now: those Japanese comics with the name I don’t know how to pronounce. (I haven’t been paying $10/pop for Yayoi Ogawa’s epic romantic comedy/commentary on gender relations in Japanese society Tramps Like Us or anything. Nope, not at all.) I forget what the actual sales percentage of Japanese versus American comics is right now, but I know it’s in favor of those across the ocean, and many of the people buying in the US are female. A blog that reviews both comics, industry issues and manga - I can type it even if I can’t say it - and is updated quite frequently, is Comics Worth Reading.

And if most of the literary world keeps on thinking that just because it’s got illustrations it’s not worth looking at, well, they’re just losing out.

Maud Newton

Maudnewton.com/blog is a literary blog concerned with book reviews, a touch of politics, and of course Maud Newton. I checked out the “about” link to find out more about the writer. She has a law degree, practiced for a few years and then returned to things she actually enjoys, much to the chagrin of her dotting parents. Her dry wit and humor is scattered all over her blog, making this one specifically enjoyable to read. Maud Newton’s blog has apparent critical praise from snooty tooty newspapers across the globe, and I haven’t decided if this makes her blog better or worse!

One of the reasons I was astonished by her site was the incredibly long list of links she has to other blogs, news sites, presses, and writing sites in general. What I enjoyed most was how she merged the political world with the world of fiction. The link between the two is almost inextricable after reading her blog. The idea that government and people want to control what we read seemed to be an overlaying theme, and something she was obviously concerned about, something this blogger thinks we should all be concerned about.

Maud Newton’s blog got me thinking about how we deal with literature we do not like. Depending on why we do not like it we seem to deal with it in different ways. For example some want to ban books due to vulgar language, others just write scathing reviews. There is a light at the end of the tunnel though. Maud mentions a Kenyan camel book delivery system. It is a library that delivers books to parts of Kenya that do not have the resources due to political turmoil. After reading this, it seems that yes, literature and politics are blurred together forever, but maybe sometimes we try and actually use books to our advantage rather than just ban or burn them.

le cadavre exquis

I took a course on prose poetry back in my undergrad days, and I remember my professor warning us about submitting to an online mag called “Exquisite Corpse.” He said that Exquisite Corpse would accept anything you submitted—so of course our ears perked up (published! hurray!) but would only seriously publish the good submissions and mock the crappy ones. So while I was online at the lib the other day, I decided to check this out.

Apparently taken from the line “The exquisite corpse will drink the new wine” (le cadavre exquis boira le vin nouveau in French—thanks Wikipedia) which was the first product of a surrealist language game similar to ‘Consequences’, Exquisite Corpse publishes both fiction and poetry, as well as book reviews, letters, essays, and sells back issues and compilations of its selections as well as books by Corpse contributors. With skulls, crossbones, and missiles splashed all over the background, it is a bit intimidating, but I decided to jump into a section with abandon, flinging caution to the wind, drink some (very) new wine, and find out about this whole mockery thing.

I browsed through “Anti-Anthropomorphism or: Animals Redeemed,” and from the looks of it, they will print anything. A recent selection:

Love Hurts

Spare me your roses
But bring forth your thorns and let
Me bleed my way home (feelings)

Can I count the ways
I’ve murdered you in my mind
NO—Far too many

Ouch. Corpse’s take: “Gregory Braquet lets us see the true Lassie [this refers to the first poem] then confesses that ‘love hurts’.” I guess the mockery bit is true.

I decided to browse the “Making and Unmaking of Person” section, which sounded promising, where I stumbled upon “Wednesdays” by Lee Ann Mortensen. It’s a piece of flash fiction (or prose poetry… where to draw the line?) and it’s hilarious. I mean laugh out loud funny. But also sort of painfully honest. A woman narrates what her lover wants, listing them off in strained points. An excerpt:

What my lover wants seventh is for us to talk, to say everything and purge ourselves. She closes her eyes and begins.
"I've always wanted another Porsche like my first husband gave me. It was red and fast and got me lots of fucking. But you'll never make enough money. I hate that," she says.
I cough and try to come up with something good. I say, "I don't particularly like your hair, I mean, it's nice hair, nice to touch." I cough a little. "I guess I don't like it after you've been jogging, or when you've put a little too much product in it. It sort of seems too sticky maybe."
She looks at me tightly because I've said "maybe" and I'm not supposed to say "maybe." I'm not supposed to equivocate.

Corpse says: “Lee Ann Mortensen demonstrates how lovers create one another.” I guess they liked it too.

Would I submit to this online mag? Well, definitely not the angsty co-ed scribbles that fill my old notebooks. But it certainly is entertaining as a spectator sport.

Grace is simple

I shelved a book at the library today whose title caught my eye. It is called The Pure Inconstancy of Grace. It’s a book of poems by Richard St. John. Something about this title wrenched at my heart immediately, as did the title’s coupling with the name of the author—St. John. I felt innately that this author might have some special authority concerning the text of such a book—that he would have something special to say, much like St. John the Baptist. I opened the book and skimmed through the list of poem titles, my excitement growing. Just about all the titles indicated a graceful and spiritual focus—titles such as “Praying in the Dark, Age 50”, “A Baptism”, “The Way the Spheres Must Move”, “The Sainthood of St. Julian”, and “From the Plate”. These titles jumped out at me as truly important. Maybe they were just tapping into my Catholic upbringing, and recent-years’ loneliness and jumbled lifestyle. I don’t know, but I began reading the book as I pushed my cart through the aisles, re-shelving all the other books. I was slow and clumsy, but could not help it because I was glued!

I haven’t read something that was truly this inviting and, well, good in awhile, even considering the extreme volume of written work I’ve been digesting. Here’s the thing that I think made this experience different and so enjoyable: I was reading something that beckoned me and that opened all the doors of communication so that I did not have to trip over anything. Simply, St. John’s work is accessible! And yet, wonderful at the same time. I’ve started to feel like, especially in contemporary literature, that poetry is more appreciated the more it does something new and probably mysterious. A lot of postmodern literature is fragmented and the format, too, can leave the reader a bit mystified as to how he or she is supposed to read it. Really, it just takes a whole lot of thought and work on the part of the reader to engage. To me, this is not necessarily the best literature—literature that demands too much of the reader, rendering the experience possibly frustrating or exhausting. Literature, to me, is very much about communicating something well, and it takes two to communicate-a speaker and a hearer. One who has ears to hear. I mean that so much, I approach a poem and don’t even know where to begin to read it—often literally, and more often in terms of it meaning. St. John’s work was refreshing in this sense.
Now, the danger here in writing in a clearer, sometimes even prose-like style in St. John’ case, is that the work becomes too simple and the art diminished. These two things do not have to go hand-in-hand, however. The images and thoughts presented are illuminated even more to me because I know how to approach them. I don’t feel frustrated by dead-ends, or the fragments of thoughts and images and whims that seem to want to tell me something, but that stop walking towards me half way across the bridge. St. John still gives the reader plenty of walking to do…across the bridge (I suppose that’s the metaphor I’m using for engagement with the text?)…but he thoughtfully and gracefully illuminates the path. He does this just by writing in a code all of us readers understand. It is simple sentences and word structure! So, it is not his form that is so incredibly clever, but the ideas and substance being communicated, so thoughtfully revealed. He makes spiritual references in almost every poem, moving in a graceful way, and weaving through references to art, music, and nature. Allow me to give some examples of his work and perhaps you can see for yourself what I mean that this work is truly graceful—approachable, structured, meaningful, and very beautiful.

--favorite lines from “A Largo”:
“A little like the face of God, we can’t look
at music directly. And so, the woman in the yard
of her apartment block cannot explain
why she is moved so by the largo of the maple seeds
spilling from the high branches, the sun
through the leaves, scattering gold florins
across the rusty wrought iron table.”
…
“Near sixty now, she’s sitting at a table in the sun.
It’s not that everything has come right in the end.
She still awakes at night, looking for lost friend
among a maze of charred foundation stones. And yet,
if God’s withdrawn, he must have left behind
at least the space and form of music. …”

Do you see already how it is not the form that is so artist, but the content?

In some places, the work gets extremely prose-like, but that maintains an intense poetic power and is not in need of any overly-smart poetic dress-up. For instance, in “A Baptism”, he says at the beginning:

“Some accounts say the sky ‘tore open.’ But in Verrocchio’s Baptism
we get only these ridiculous, disembodied hands,
releasing a stylized, downward-pointing dove. It’s said
that Verraccio abandoned painting altogether when he saw
how leonardo’s angel, detailed as apprentice-work
in the foreground, outshone his. Still, it’s Verraccio’s angel
that attracts me…”

He goes on to link this to a scene at a maternity ward, all the babies, even the sickly, like angels. St. John’s material is genuine and so does not need any fancy formatting to be special. In fact, to me it may be even more special because I sense the thoughtful and beautiful intention and experience of the author in much of the work. It is not distant from the author or from the earth, or spirit. This is truly good poetry. No tricks or gimmicks, no clever elusions, just simple and graceful presentation. Thanks, St. John!

The Presentation of Poetry (and where the future will take us)

I just got back from a poetry reading by Justin Katko and Katherine Fronk and I figure I might as well add a little blurb about it here on my blog. I almost didn’t go because it was so wet and miserable out (get me out of Ohio!) but I’m glad I decided to attend. Justin is a grad student at a local university and he really seemed to put together some interesting work. It’s always cool to see what kind of work grad students are doing—it’s kind of like looking into the future. The work presented tonight was part of an ongoing series called Ritten To.

Katherine Fronk, who I believe is an undergraduate student, presented her work first. The poetry she read seemed much more conventional than the poetry Justin would present in a media format later. Katherine’s work seemed very accessible to the average listener or reader. Most of her poetry seemed a little dark, but my favorite one she read was entitled Dreaming in Circles. It was written in three parts, and each part played off the previous one. The sound of it was quite beautiful to listen to.

Starkly contrasted to Katherine’s conventional poetry is the collaborative work she did with Justin. They presented a poem called Scores, a video filmed and edited by the two young poets. To sum it up, they cut up little exam booklets that students use to write essays on during tests. With the little tiny cut up parts, they write one or two words per page. With video editing, they flip through each page rapidly, flashing several words in succession every second. (Think subliminal message style poetry). The words flew by so fast I had no idea what I read. However, in the end, I felt like I got something out of it all. It was extremely interesting work and I can’t say I’ve ever seen anything like it before.

I wonder about the new digital age that poetry is entering and the new ways poetry is being presented. As far as this reading goes, the video poetry grabbed my attention much more profoundly than the conventional poetry. However, the conventional poetry was much more accessible. Poetry seems to be exploring different modes of presentation that fiction cannot. In a digital age, it would seem the best way to attract an audience’s attention towards a piece of work is through digital presentation. However, this is not always a benefit. If a poem can only be presented digitally, then fewer people will have access to it. I guess until this kind of poetry can be more easily and widely shared, poets will have to share their work through more conventional means if they hope to reach a wider audience.

Stephen Rodefer Reading

I’ve been reading some work by the poet Stephen Rodefer lately. There are quite a few books of his to choose from at the library, as he’s been writing and publishing for some time. (I believe his first book was published around 1965, but don’t quote me on that one.) At any rate, I had the opportunity to go over to the university and hear him read earlier this week. I have to be honest with you here, and I hate to come across as negative and be judged for doing so, but I’m still not sure what to make of this guy. He is obviously a very smart man, as some of the poems he read he’d translated from French and I picked up on the inclusion of a little German in a few of the poems he read also. Plus, he writes often with a tone of sarcasm, which I find extremely difficult to do effectively. But he is quite eccentric and I had some trouble following a few of his poems, as they jumped from between what seemed to me were random topics. (In the introduction, it was said that Rodefer was thrown out of Cambridge, if that gives you any idea of his character.) On the surface, and this is very, very simplified, but Rodefer sort of just came off as an old man who liked to drink and write about sex. Obviously there’s more to him than this, but I couldn’t help but look at him as such at points in the reading. However, I must admit that the reading did give some additional clarity to Rodefer’s work and I think I enjoyed and understood his poems more at his reading than I did in my own individual reading of them.

Rodefer’s reading was divided into two sections; first he read some of his past work and then after a short break he read some of his more recent work and projected it onto the screen. A few of the poems that he read early on I really enjoyed. They seemed to have a theme of giving up on love or regret that related to love—and even in another poem, to school. These poems seemed to have more of a conventional flow to them I felt than his newer work. It did help that when Rodefer read his newer work it was projected onto a screen so that I could follow along. In this portion of the reading, I felt that he approached the work with varying tones and highlighted a change in the feel of the poem with his voice. This really interested me and I am curious as to why I noticed it more in the second half of the reading than the first.

One thing that I liked about this reading was that I came away from it with two big, deep ideas to think about. First, in the introduction the question was raised, What are we looking for in a poet these days? I’m not really sure I have an answer to this question, as poetry seems to do too many things to whittle it down to having one characteristic or purpose. Secondly, in addition to reading poetry, Rodefer shared some of his artwork, which was primarily paintings of phrases. One included a quote that he wrote down and believes he has just started to figure out: There’s always a place for a woman who knows how to fall off a pony in New York. Rodefer proposed that this meant that there is always a place for a woman that knows how to leave a man in New York, which taps into feminism and is an idea I am sort of fond of. I am curious though as to what other ways there are to interpret this.

keep your muse slender

Picked up Harryette Mullen’s Recyclopedia the other day, which includes her books S*PeRM**K*T, Trimmings, and Muse & Drudge. In S*PeRM**K*T, Mullen uses common language—advertising jargon, specifically—to drive home her theme of, as Mullen herself said in an interview with Daniel Kane, “The direction of what's called globalization. Are we members of a global village, or just consumers or investors in a virtual global market?” She uses jingles recognizable to all American consumers, but adds unexpected endings, twisting them and coaxing out new meanings. The following are several examples from her untitled prose poems in S*PeRM**K*T: “Don’t wait to be told… you explode”; “Never let them see you… eat”; “Raise your hand if you’re sure… you’re not.”
In doing so, Mullen plays with the reader’s expectations. American society has become so conditioned that the public doesn’t question advertising slogans; they simply accept them and hum along. By twisting these phrases, Mullen points out the folly of consumerism, capitalism, and the good old American drive to succeed.
Each prose poem is assigned a different product/image; reading the poem has the sense of strolling through the supermarket. Petroleum, bug spray, breakfast cereal, pork products, baby food, buttermilk, soup cans, frozen food, and meat: all of these images work with the idea of consumerism and the global market. The title, whose asterisks can be easily filled in to spell “supermarket,” works with this idea as well, but if the poem is a jibe at the American dream, the existing title of “sperm kit” works to highlight the plastic, endless permutations of the Aryan ideal in American culture. Mullen’s brilliance lies in the fact that both of these themes work simultaneously, which makes S*PeRM**K*T so successful.
A harsh examination of gender roles appear repeatedly in this work; in one poem, Mullen says, “But the gleam of a sigh at a spotless rinsed dish. Spots herself in its service, buffed and rebuffed… The silver dropped at dinner announces the arrival of a woman at a fork. She beams at a waxing moon.” The wordplay in this poem is exquisite: with the double meaning of “rebuffed,” as in women’s traditional, subservient place in society, as well as the polish theme; the image of a piece of silverware being dropped at dinner because of a woman at a fork—which the reader will immediately free associate with “woman at work;” a woman beaming at a “waxing moon,” both a term for a phase of the moon and a hint that the woman’s place hasn’t changed, for she is still waxing and polishing in the household.
The last poem in the section seems to reiterate the emptiness of it all: “Flies in buttermilk. What a fellowship… Homo means the same… Our cows are well adjusted. The lost family album keeps saying cheese.” After pages of detailing each idiosyncracy
of the American dream—pointing out the folly that others blindly accept—Mullen ends the book with the last line of her last poem, “Speed readers skim the white space of this galaxy—” seeming jab at the readers of her book, who are just as guilty as everyone else of falling into the trap of the American dream, consumerism, and mindless allegiance to ideas presented to the American people by society. Through using the ingenious backdrop of a supermarket, Mullen paints a bleak, tongue-in-cheek portrait of American culture; with images of typical supermarket products, she critiques society’s values, body image, gender roles, family life, consumerism, and the American dream.

Harryette Mullen’s excerpt from “Trimmings” works so well, in the way that some of Stein’s language works; it makes sense intuitively, though not necessarily logically. When I read these poems, I got the sense that she was describing a prostitute. Lines like, “Opens up a little leg, some slender, high exposure… Buy another peek experience, price is slashed” and “A tomato isn’t hard. It splits in heat, easy,” lend to this idea. One of the best lines I’ve ever read to describe a woman’s place, according to society, is in the second to last stanza. “Her paper parasol and open fan become her multiplication of a rib which is connected and might start a fire for cooking.” The imagery—paper parasol, fan, cooking—all enforce the docile, domestic role of a woman (traditionally), while the open fan imagery transforms into the “multiplication of a rib,” hinting at the Creation story, where woman is made from Adam’s rib, and therefore, as a part (which is connected), is inferior and forced to serve him, cheerfully, eternally (start a fire for cooking.)
While it does seem that Mullen was talking about a prostitute in this poem, she could also be referring to the role for women in society as a whole. I can’t remember who said this—it was a late 19th century female writer, I think—who said that marriage was just a form of prostitution, because women married for financial benefits (to be taken care of) for sex, making it nothing more than glorified prostitution. The text may or may not support this, but the fifth stanza includes very virginal imagery; “Or strayed mermaid, tail split, bleeds into the sea. With brand new feet walks unsteady on land, each step an ache.”
Muse & Drudge is the only book not written in prose poems. Instead, Mullen uses free verse, but wordplays in her signature style, interjecting dialect choices into pop culture references like “Miz Mary takes a mack truck in/ trade for her slick black cadillac” and twists idioms: “you have the girl you paid for/ now lie on her.”

I’m a fan.

Link for Mullen interview: http://www.writenet.org//poetschat/poetschat_h_mullen.html

Creative Non-Fiction, Eye Opening!

As far as what I thought about this current issue of Our Roots are Deep with Passion, I just think it is absolutely great. One of the girls that I work with at the library gave me a link on this creative non-fiction journal that she suggested would help me with this writers block I have been having. I am not sure what exactly did it for me that got me out of this writing depression, but I have this magazine to thank! I wonder what gets others out of this rut, is it just a particular story, or a person that makes a lasting impression, I would be curious to know what others do to deal with this blockage?
I really loved the first story; it made me think of what life would really be like without such a dependency on water. What first caught my attention was the title of the first story, ’Mbriago. Come to find out as I read the short story it means drunk, mainly referring to the narrator’s grandfather. The story goes on to talk about the grandfather and how he was subjected to only drinking wine, mostly because water was so costly and wine was cheap, and abundant. He only did what he thought was normal, and that led the author to think that was normal. In the end the narrator tells a neighbor that the smell that her grandfather left in her mind was that of wine, of course.
This story was so lively and created some emotion for me. Ironically the narrator/author said that she also had a drinking obsession as her grandfather. I too had a grandfather whose life was consumed with a bottle in hand. In high school I struggled to be in the “it” crowd, always trying to impress. Drinking came to be an outlet for me; whenever I went to one of the cool parties on the weekend I would be the one who had too much to drink. I am sure that many of my classmates thought of that alcohol smell when they saw me staggering into the party. I wonder if those kids still talk about those parties and my stupidity?

Poems into Ploughshares

I have another good read to share, Ploughshares. I seem to be devouring literary magazine lately, but there are so many out there! I was having car trouble this morning (ugh) so I had to catch a ride to work with my brother. This also meant that I was stuck at work an extra couple of hours, but what better place to kill time than the library! I picked Ploughshares (winter 2006-07 issue) off the periodicals display because it looked nice and thick, a good time filler. It wasn’t as fancy or flashy as some other the others I’ve read, but was stuffed full of good poetry and fiction!

It was a nicely diverse collection, nothing too out there, but a nice variety, and nearly 200 pages of material. The majority of the magazine was poetry, but there were also five or six pieces of fiction, one of which, “Safekeeping” by Janis Hallowell (if I recall it correctly) was especially captivating. It’s about a very hefty woman who is hired as a housekeeper and assistant for a famous writer, who also likes to keep things between folds of her skin (her breasts and belly fat). The character, Irene, is certainly very quirky but also quite endearing. Two of the poems I liked best were a piece by Jeffery Harrison called “Danger: Tulips” and one by Peggy Boyers, “Bitch Diary.” The latter was from the perspective of a truffle hunting dog (I think), which was amusing and the choice of the language was also good, I thought. “Danger: Tulips” caught me with its odd title, but the description of this strange abandoned-mental-hospital-and-church-in-a-meadow was very captivating and really clear. I really liked it’s juxtaposition of serene nature and this dangerous asbestos-riddled and abandoned place.

I don’t know if this lends a very good picture of the magazine, but really it’s just a solid collection of poetry and fiction, with a little something for everyone (more or less). I’ll definitely check out future issues, because I really like the variety and general accessibility of the poetry and fiction as well. Oh, what wonderful things I discover while entertaining myself!

internalizing paint splatters and poems-that-fuck

I managed to get my hands on the October 5, 2006 copy of Another Chicago Magazine. The cover’s black typewriter splattered with pink paint and with hearts on some of the keys kind of gave me the image of a young punk. A repeated little graphic inside was that of a book with “ACM” written on it on fire, and the page numbers were inside little ink splatters. Author names were in a cute cursive font. The type was spaced out nicely. My compliments to the designer - while literary magazines have to be about the words of course, too many other literary magazines I’ve looked at have small type inside and a boring cover. The one problem I had was that there were occasionally typos like missing tabs at beginnings of new paragraphs and missing apostrophes – the first time I saw it I thought it was maybe a weird stylistic thing, but then I saw the same problems in other stories erratically.

The particular issue I picked up has poems, translations of foreign poems, stories, nonfiction, one excerpt from a longer work, short shorts, one interview, and a small reviews section at the end. Each set of poems in translation was preceded by a translator’s note explaining that individual translator’s methodology, which I thought was really cool. I’m not too up on any foreign language myself, but from what I’ve heard each individual translator puts a different spin on things, especially in poetry, where transferring things like alliteration and hard/soft sounds from language to language can be difficult. In theory, two translators could start with the same source material and end with two different poems in English. So it was nice to hear what was going through the translators’ heads. Also, in most cases the magazine printed the original language versions of the poems too.

Particular pieces in the issue that grabbed me included “Soy extranjera/I am the Foreign One,” by Graciela Reyes, its vision of the interconnected and disconnected nature of all humans in simple, but striking images of the author’s experience with travel. The lone interview with fiction writer and Bosnia refugee Alexander Hemon was grabbing for his unconventional views on writing – he claims that creative writing programs often tend to discourage things he calls “mistakes,” breaking-the-mold writing that may end up being worthless but also may end up being something worth saving. He said he didn’t write every day either – only when he felt like he had something to say. I’ve been reading a lot of advice from writers lately and most seem to be professors not willing to discuss negatives of creative writing programs and also encourage writing every day. A dissenting opinion was kind of refreshing.

The poem “Fuck You” by Nin Andrews stood out for its comparison between humans and poems; the narrator, addressing the audience, calls both “small in size but not meaning.” At the end, the narrator declares that no matter if you liked this poem or not, it is inside you, fucking you. Funny image out of the way, I suppose this pointing narrator wants us to know that we internalize some of everything we read, whether we like it or not, whether it’s the news or a NASCAR romance novel (yeah, I heard about that), or the new fad novel. I thought this issue of Another Chicago Magazine was a pretty good thing to internalize on a cloudy afternoon.

Doors, Memory, and Writing...

After a long night of reading, specifically Roddy Doyle’s The Woman Who Walked Into Doors, I thought I would make a post. It was excellent! I have to say I was not expecting it to be the way it was. Most of my expectations came from reading Paddy Clark Ha Ha Ha (a very very long time ago), which, I remember to be funny and sad at the same time. This book however was gloomier than anything else. I decided to go back to Doyle after reading his interview in Tin House and can honestly say I want to read the sequel to this book, and anything else out there by him.

The Woman Who Walked Into Doors is about Paula Spencer, a mother of four, a widow, and an alcoholic. The first half of the book is deceiving. Paula is just telling you about her life, about how she use to write in elementary school, and her marriage, her children and her work. Then you get into the second half of the book, where you learn her husband Charlo had a tendency to beat her. I wasn’t surprised. There are hints throughout the novel, but the way she describes the beatings is heart wrenching. The fact that she feels hopeless and no one, not even the doctors ask if he is hitting her is worse.

There are a lot of reasons why I like this book, and why I am so impressed with it. As a writer I was impressed that he so accurately took on a female persona. She did not feel like a false character, and the story seemed honest. So honest it felt less like fiction and more like a non-fictional account, like Paula wrote this herself. The writing felt like it all happened at once. There are breaks in time that are not always linear. This can be confusing but for some reason with this book they felt natural. I guess what I am trying to say, very inarticulately is that this felt like stream of consciousness writing.

The end of the novel becomes incredibly heavy. Paula describes the 80’s as a blur or one beating after another. You might ask, why are you impressed with this? Most stories about women and domestic violence seem to end in a Lifetime movie script. Doyle stays away from this by not making it about domestic abuse. The story is about Paula’s abuse. It is about the fact that she blamed herself for it. It is about the way she remembers her life.

The novel left me thinking about memory and how we write about memory, fictional or non-fictional memories. Paula admits that things are blurry, and speaks a lot about whether or not her memories are honest or if they have been changed by time. The fact that Paula has this conversation with the reader makes it feel more comfortable with her. I felt a level of trust with Paula that I may not have had without that conversation. In fact, when I started reading I questioned her actions because of her alcoholism and that her sisters remembered events in their lives differently.

On a different note…the title, The Woman Who Walked Into Doors ended up being extremely important throughout the novel. You do not know what its importance is until the end of the novel, but looking back the imagery of doors was everywhere. When Paula meets Charlo’s mother there is a conversation about the door in his house. It is heavy and you have to lift it to close it. The beginning of the novel you find out that Paula is scared to answer the door, because she doesn’t know what is on the other side. She hates the doorbell and any association with it. The fact that she blames her beatings on running into a door or falling down the stairs, and then is constantly afraid that her husband will walk back through the door to kill her create an interesting conversation about what doors represent. I’m not sure I’ve figured it all out yet, but I know it will be on my mind. Well Captain is scratching at the door, time for a walk. I guess my big question of this post, and to my readers is how can anyone write with such intention? Do we outline everything to make these things appear or do they come naturally?

What Should Fiction Do?

While I’ve mostly been spying on poetry blogs lately, I stumbled across an interesting blog about fiction that is put out by the Chiasmus Press. (http://chiasmuspress.wordpress.com/). It’s called Other Mouths and there is a very interesting discussion going on right now among several of the bloggers/authors who contribute to the website. The discussion is very recent (which I appreciate) and has been raging all week. The question was posed, “What should fiction do?”

Hoping to write something substantial myself someday, I recognized this blog topic as beneficial for any aspiring writer. Before telling you what I think fiction should do (in my own so humble opinion), I’ll let you know what some other, more accomplished writers, thought. Lance Olson believes fiction should “disrupt assumptions behind narratives” and “challenge the dominant culture.” While I agree that doing this is important, I do not agree that all fiction should do this. It seems too specific of a goal and I feel that fiction and writing in general is bigger than that. However, I do believe that fiction needs to do something new. Something that will make readers notice it. Whether or not this newness has to challenge the dominant culture is debatable. Trevor Dodge seems to agree with me when he writes, “writing should throw a psychotic fit in front of you because you haven’t been paying enough attention to it lately.” I found Trevor’s post to be the funniest and wittiest of the group and I certainly agree with his opinion of what fiction should do the most. In a world with so many other distractions, fiction needs to have more ingenuity, originality, and creativity than it ever did in the past.

The uncertainty and varying opinion of what fiction should actually do among fiction writers themselves becomes apparent as I scroll down the posts. One author even writes, “I don’t feel entirely certain in regards to what ‘writing’ even is just
now.” It’s a relief to know that other, more adept writers, don’t know what fiction should do, because I certainly don’t have a concrete answer. When we as readers step into the world of a fictional piece, it does something different to each of us. Putting a reader into that world is what I believe fiction should do, but how it puts us there will seemingly always be debatable. To come to a consensus over what fiction should do would seem to be detrimental to the creative aspect of writing in the first place. Author’s varying view of this concept is what gives their work its individuality.

Check out the blog. I promise it will get some wheels turning.

the "green apple", a little modern food for thought

I went to see Marjorie Welish give a lecture yesterday. She’s a poet, artist, and art critic—all of which shinned through in the lecture. Also, it might be interesting to note that she was previously a professor at Brown, teaching currently at the Pratt Institute, and is on leave as a Fulbright Scholar in Frankfurt. Needless to say, she is a very intelligent and accomplished woman…and honestly was a little much for me to grasp. I mean, did anyone in that room really understand everything she was saying? I heard the words and followed the sentences, I suppose it was just difficult to put all the sentences together into a thought I could hold onto. Ms. Welish spoke much like a modern artist, by which I mean that she spoke in the way a modern painting looks. You have to have certain eyes to know how to see it because it is so abstracted and often disjointed in feeling. Perhaps I just don’t have the ears to hear what she’s saying. Anyways, let me discuss a little of what I ascertained.
Her lecture was basically a sort of history of modern art, explaining the sequence of a handful of important artists. She listed a handful of important artists—most notably to me, the New York School, who marked the American expression of modernism, according to Ms. Welish. By way of explaining snippets of progression through modern art, she discussed one important concept. This concept lends itself to issues of current discussion in modern and postmodern circles. What is the significance of a word in terms of its true representation of reality? What makes a word represent the same thing to multiple people? At what point does the word need to change to represent another reality? And according to whom?
These are interesting questions, and remind me a little of my first blog post here where I was asking about the line between poetry and visual art. What happens in that grey area? Where is the line between these two terms, and who sets it? Marjorie used a few examples of her own to get us thinking about this same issue. For instance, the color red. What shade of red is the most fundamental red and what are other versions of it? When you add yellow, at what point is the color no longer red and becomes orange? She explains that different people have different eyes for red, perhaps due to cultural influence—such as “Chinese red” or “Vermillion red,” all shades of red traditionally associated with usage in different places.
To me, this sounds like a basic argument for relativism in terms of our linguistic usage. No one person can call something a certain word and say that is the only word that works to represent that thing. To illuminate this point, at the end of the lecture, she holds up a green apple and asks us what we say this is. Some would say, “a piece of fruit”, some would say “an object exhibiting the concept of ‘round’”, and others would say “not red”.
Though I don’t think this grand finale was all that original, I suppose it is a fertile discussion to touch on anyway. What elements are necessary to name something one word or another. For instance, does a “city” begin when there are a certain number of people, as Marjorie postulates? Or, does it begin when certain other essential forms are exhibited? While this is a rich subject to roll around in our minds and play on, I am not seeing how this is more than a typical post-modern debate of relativism—in a linguistic sense. I think it makes a point about the fluidity and created sense of language—that it cannot hold perfectly because it is created by man. A green apple is still exactly what it is—and what it is not—whether or not we find the words to describe it. It is the representation that can be so relative. Representation can take on unending forms, as I could describe the green apple with a million words, or paint it in a million ways, etcetera. Our language is just a representation and a grasping, not the reality behind it which is still.

I guess that Marjorie’s lecture, despite not understanding all of it, really did get me thinking!

'Weaving' a new understanding

So I heard about this play going on at the University nearby and since I had nothing better to do, decided to check it out. I've always liked plays and this was an original by Dianne Yeahquo Reyner titled 'Weaving the Rain'. I don't know much about Native American culture, but apparently they have their own theatre company in Kansas.

Anyway, the play deals with many issues relevant to all people in society. Some issues touched on were assimilation, family dynamics, and relations between Native Americans and non-Native Americans. The focus was on family, dealing with a family member in the hospital, and not knowing what will happen. It forced the characters to examine their lives and how they came to be where they are. This could happen to anyone from any background, but I found it interesting to view the issues the Native American community faces, as I've never really thought about them.

This was a piece of historical fiction. As I was watching, I tried to pick out what aspects were historically accurate from those that were made up. Since Reyner is a Native American, I figure she probably has a good understanding of the struggles the community faces on a daily basis.

Reyner set up the play well. I really liked the dialogue. Though the subject matter was sad, the humor of the dialogue off-set the seriousness of the situation. Each character also had a distinct identity, representing a different aspect of the culture. The mom represented the generation that was sent to boarding school. One of the sons was an alcoholic attempting to get clean. The other son stayed home to take care of his aging parents. The daughter represented the group that assimilated, breaking away from the culture to attend college and find a better job. It was interesting to see how each of their choices affected the family, and the way they viewed one another. Plus, some Native American songs were incorporated. I thought it was a nice touch, and the program even explained the meaning of each one, showing how it fit with the play.

Sapphire

With the weather as bad as it’s been lately (I suppose I should have expected snow, ice and cold in Midwestern winters), I’ve had a lot of free time to explore writing communities. The library has been closing early and even when it is open, it isn’t very busy. It seems that most people just aren’t willing to brave the outdoors for a few new books. I’ve spent a lot of time on the blogs that Ron Silliman has links to on his own blog. I really admire Silliman and so feel that work that somehow crosses paths with his is definitely worth checking out. A few of the blogs didn’t catch my interest as I hoped they would, but I did find a few that I think I’m going to begin visiting on a more regular basis. One in particular is a blog titled Naked Superstar Poetry by someone who calls herself Mrs. Universe. (The link on Silliman’s blog was called Sapphire, which is what initially attracted me to the blog. Many other links used the full names of individuals and “Sapphire” really stood out to me as something creative, different and worth exploring.)

Before focusing on the actual postings, I looked into the About Me section of the blog. Right away, I really felt like I could connect with Mrs. Universe, primarily because she is twenty-five years old. She does have a husband, children, and an Internet Marketing career, which aren’t exactly things I can brag about, but I still had a feeling of understanding this blogger; perhaps because I expected so many of the links on Silliman’s blog to be academic and serious and hard to relate to. This is getting difficult to clearly describe. I’m just going to skip ahead to a fact that really caught my attention: Mrs. Universe claims to have been nominated for the Guinness Book of World Records for the highest priced auction ever run on Ebay. This really intrigued me; I’m curious as to what the item auctioned was!

Most of the blog consists of poetry written by Mrs. Universe, which is written with a very simplistic style and tone. She writes about everyday events, such as waking up with a child in the middle of the night and missing sleep. However this lack of sleep and her love for her husband (another topic of the poems) seem to be laced with a lot of emotion and are much more than just routine happenings. Her focus on family and emotions related to them makes the poetry very relatable.

In addition to poetry, Mrs. Universe includes some humor and fun that is separated, to a certain degree, from her personal life and writings. For instance, she has also posted in response to an article on Maxim.com titled, Everything You Know…Is Wrong. She lists common wives tales the article included and her attempt to understand which is true and which is false, such as “I was sure cell phones gave you brain issues…Or was that hair dye?” This really breaks up the poetry and keeps the blog from becoming just another poetry blog with personal writing to sludge through.

I was disappointed to find that Naked Superstar Poetry has not been updated since mid-January. While it seems obvious to me that Mrs. Universe has a lot going on in her life (with children, pregnancy and work) I’m still hoping for more regular updates in the future.

I'm going to go cut myself so I know I still feel now...

I was messing around on the internet last night reading some blogs (I know, what else is new), and came across one particular blog that I couldn’t quite figure out. By this I mean that I couldn’t tell if the person was trying to be serious or if it was all one big joke. The blog is called Alcoholic Poet (http://alcoholicpoet.blogspot.com/index.html). It is basically a bunch of over the top, sad, pathetic, I want to go cut myself so I know that I still feel type of poems. The whole thing is so over the top that I originally thought that there was absolutely no way that this could be serious. I actually began to laugh out loud a couple times. I mean, how could you not laugh at a poem called “Cut the Baby in Half”? I’m not saying that cutting babies in half is funny but the ridiculousness of doom and gloom nature of it all was down right laughable.

Then I began to feel kind of bad. What if this was a serious blog and this person meant these poems to be taken seriously? I know there are people out there who are into this kind of stuff. I guess it just kind of surprised me when I came across it, you know? If it was real I feel like a terrible person for having laughed at it. But then again, maybe it isn’t real and this is exactly the type of reaction that the blogger is trying to get.

I really just don’t know what to think. It’s very possible that this person is totally serious about the work that is posted but then again it’s also just as possible that they are trying to trick us all. This leads me to an even bigger question: how much of what I come across online is real and how much is just a big hoax? I don’t know if I can ever really know for sure. It is kind of fun to think about though, however confusing it may be at times. Just some food for thought.

Diigo and TagCrowd and Hypertext, Oh My!

So I was poking around the internet again this morning and I came across another interesting blog, WRT: Writer Response Theory, “a blog and podcast dedicated to discussing text art forms.” (http://writerresponsetheory.org). Including some posts I found about hypertext literature and some crazy stuff called “Literatronica” and “Diigo Fiction.” I was intrigued. I’ve sort of heard of hypertext writing but I don’t really know much about it, generally preferring something I can literally snuggle up with, but hey, I guess I’m sort of self-educating myself about internet literary happenings etc and I should give it a look.

Although I’ll admit I’m a bit intimidated by some of this high-tech literature/ literary techniques, it’s also really exciting stuff. One of the first things I saw when I happened upon the site was this quote: “Let us write stories in the margins of the Web: The web is becoming ours to write with.” This sort of feeling/idea makes me really excited to be a writer at this time in history, with this whole new writing world opening up and all these new options that never existed, like, a mere decade ago. I don’t know if this is really the kind of stuff I want to pursue in my own writing, but, like I said, it’s really cool.

In addition to discussing internet lit and text art, this site offers some really neat links, like TagCrowd.com. The internet can do so many awesome things! One of the other things discussed on the blog was the potential of the internet as a sharing tool, and things like “Social bookmarking.” You have to check out this site and all the links! The most recent post (9 February) talks a lot about marginalia/writing from the margins, and using the internet to do some in the contemporary era. I went to the Diigo site (http://diigo.com/) and found it pretty cool too.

I guess what I’m trying to say here is that it’s really awesome how writers are using the internet to update/reinvent the craft. Sites like Diigo almost make the internet into a giant notebook, even providing virtual “Sticky notes.” Writers are no longer limited by the communities they live in for support/feedback/etc, and lucky for me because I live in the middle-of-nowhere Ohio. I’m getting really excited about this stuff the more I think about it, but alas, back to work!

Trying to make feeling stupid into a good feeling...

Captain woke me up at 6 a.m. wanting to play. I cannot say work was easy after such an early wake up call. While I was half asleep at the library I picked up the “Tin House Summer Reading” magazine. I thought about taking it back home with me for the twenty-four hour loan period but decided against it. The possibility of me inadvertently stealing it was too risky, not to mention Captain’s love of eating softer books.

What made me read this magazine was an interview with Roddy Doyle. I read one of his books, Paddy Clark, Ha, ha, ha, about three or four years ago. I didn’t know a lot about him as an author before this interview, but now I feel the need to go pick up another one of his books and explore his writing again. He sounded so ferocious and opinionated. One of my many favorite quotes from the interview: “When I’m writing and researching, trying to recreate a place that’s gone or a place that won’t be familiar to most readers, I try to find images that are very visual and promise meaning beyond the visual.” (Page 69) This topic came up when the interviewer, Tom Grimes, began to discuss 9/11. At first I was appalled, thinking, haven’t we heard enough of this, when will this question end! But he took it into a new direction about the horror I think we all felt and re-feel when we look at pictures of the twin towers. The horror that is caused by the blue-sky effect, the visual of such a perfect day becoming what it became. Doyle’s discussion on visual seems so perfect after Grimes’ discussion, and brought everything back to writing. I was amazed he could take a discussion of sky color on a tragic day and make that about writing.

The other exciting discussion in the interview, for me at least, was when they brought up Harold Pinter’s Nobel Prize Speech. I have to admit when I know who is being talked about in any of these magazines I get excited and feel slightly nerdy in a good, warm feeling way. Their discussion of his “denunciation” of the United States lead Doyle to say he agreed and disagreed, but where he agreed is important. He thinks that part of writing is “to be stupid—and tell the truth. It’s how we tell the truth, how we tell the story—that’s where the writing, the hard work, comes in.”(Page 67) For some reason this quote re-assured me on my own writing journey. I think as a writer, and one who considers herself to still feel somewhat young, I try and stay away from being stupid, but I feel stupid all the time. It might be something I could try and embrace more often. It also made me feel stupid for taking myself too seriously sometimes. I’m not sure if that is confusing or just trite. This discussion reminded me of Colbert's Truthiness and how important that idea has become to us as a culture. We seem to all be searching for Truth and meaning, and I think what Doyle is trying to say is that we need to be stupid to tell the truth and do it in an honest way.

I feel like I need to wrap up my thoughts. I have to say I really enjoyed reading this magazine, not just for the interview with Roddy Doyle, but the first story, “Memory” by Stephan King was powerfully mesmerizing and I have to say felt more horrifically human than his twins (from The Shinning). The ending was so horrific and real to me I cannot stop thinking about it. Especially since Captain wants to watch the dog show tomorrow night (he would watch it tonight but brother is here watching the history channel…we can tomorrow night when brother leaves the house with unusual date…) The story really got me thinking about the line between something that is scary and something that is horrific. I now feel the names have been misused, especially with movies. I think that to be a horror genre book or film there has to be something very human about the scariness. That it has to be something you can imagine happening to you. I will assume we have all seen The Hills Have Eyes, but that was horrific because of the rape scene. Everything else was just scary. King’s story was horrific because the accident was real, powerful, and the pain that happened to his narrator seemed like it could happen to any of us.

I also loved the piece “Eating Fish Alone” by Lydia Davis. It made me want to go home and make fish or watch Food Network. Of course I didn’t go anywhere near the kitchen, but it made me want to. The piece made me want to write lists as well. I feel it better to not explain this, if you haven’t read this piece, read it and make a list.

I’m not sure how to end today, how about I just say adieu until tomorrow.

Absinthe in the Morning???

Some people warm up with a hot cup of cocoa, but on those real chilling days, I settle down with a healthy serving of Absinthe to get my juices flowing. Absinthe, an American literary periodical that strictly features “new European” writers, attracts my attention at the library this morning. And while I’m not used to starting off my day with Absinthe, I think I can make an exception today.
Flipping through the mag, I find a story entitled, Dazzled by Bananas, by Thomas Rosenlocher (German), and the title understandably catches my eye. The story is set in Socialist West Berlin during the 1980’s and is told from the perspective of a young child. The child’s desire for a commodity as simple as bananas exemplifies the tension between scarcity and abundance in West and East Berlin. When the Wall finally falls, the child loses his insatiable appetite for bananas because he can suddenly get them whenever he wants. Was it the same once the West Berliner’s got used to freedom? Since all of the stories are translated I wonder how much is lost in translation, but I think this story still delivers a powerful message…and it makes me want to get a banana.
Absinthe features more fiction than poetry, but one poem I read seems to stand out above the rest. It is written by Ramon Gomez de la Serna (Spain) who is said to be the inventor of gregueria (brief and often humorous poetic statements). For instance, in this untitled, five-line poem he writes, “Trees know only that they exist thanks to their shade” and “The moon is the only traveler without a passport.” The simplicity of these statements is both hilarious and beautiful. I’m tempted to try to imitate it in my own writing… “Julia knows only that she exists because she could really go for that banana right now.” That might need some work. Also, I wonder why Absinthe claims to feature New European Writing when Ramon Gomez de la Serna died in 1963. I guess new is a relative term, especially when it comes to Europe. Regardless, the writing is amazing.
Britain, Norway, Madrid, Germany, Switzerland, Italy, and Turkey are just some of the countries the featured authors are from. Such an eclectic selection of stories and experiences makes Absinthe a great way to explore the scope of the world’s creative writing community. (And it’s cheaper than a plane ticket to Europe!) I get so caught up in trying to figure out and fit into a local writing community that I forget about all the other ones out there. Throughout the course of browsing through this periodical, I began to distinguish a different style in European writing than our own, both in subject matter and in prose. Is this an imagined difference? Is it brought about due to translation? Or is it actually there? It also makes me wonder what the rest of the world thinks of American writing…This Absinthe is really starting to get to my head. Until next time.

Here Comes Everybody

Sunday’s a slow day at the library, especially in freezing mid-winter temperatures, so I’m cozied up at the circulation desk, surfing the web and hoping my boss doesn’t catch me. I thought that I could get some ideas for my blog by reading other literary blogs. I started at Ron Silliman’s blog, which is completely daunting to a novice blogger like myself.

I’ve been playing around on “Here Comes Everybody,” a blog that asks the same ten questions to different contemporary poets. I’ve read some of the archives, and poets such as kari edwards, Jonathan Skinner, Rebecca Wolff (current editor of Fence), Dana Ward, Linh Dinh, Kristin Prevallet, to name a few of the ones I recognize, have been interviewed.

1. What is the first poem you ever loved? Why?

Kristin Prevallet described finding “a slim volume of Dorothy Parker’s Selected Poems, heavily marked up by her mother with exclamation points and smiley faces.” I like the idea of poetry being hidden in the drawer, like a flask, sneaking sips when no one’s looking. Why can’t we have Poets Anonymous? Oh wait, we do: blogs.

As for me, I loved Shel Silverstein as a kid and thought that Frost’s “Birches” was so sadly beautiful,-- esp. the lines, “here your face burns and tickles with the cobwebs/
Broken across it, and one eye is weeping/ From a twig's having lashed across it open.”
But I think the first poem that really impacted me was e.e. cummings’ “maggie and millie and molly and may:”

maggie and millie and molly and may
went down to the beach (to play one day)

and maggie discovered a shell that sang
so sweetly she couldn't remember her troubles,and

millie befriended a stranded star
who's rays five languid fingers were;

and molly was chased by a horrible thing
which raced sideways while blowing bubbles:and

may came home with a smooth round stone
as small as a world and as large as alone.

For whatever we lose (like a you or a me)
it's always ourselves we find in the sea.”
“a smooth round stone/ as small as a world and as large as alone.” In less than two lines, cummings captures loneliness, apprehension, wonder, identity—this poem definitely made me want to know more about poetry.

2. What is something/someone non-"literary" you read which may
surprise your peers/colleagues? Why do you read it/them?

kari edwards in Dec. 2006 said, “what is not literary? where is that demarcation, maybe the telephone book? the back of a can of beans? Is not most of what is written literary? and is it not our definition that is limited?”

I tend to agree, but for the sake of answering this question: in my pathetic attempt to become culturally relevant and hip, I’ve been reading things like DIW and Nylon. Sometimes the sheer volume of pop culture references overwhelms me to the point that I feel that if I wasn’t already born with the info of, say, Trivial Pursuit or Lorelai Gilmore, I’m never going to be able to interact and relate to the world.

I also read Dog & Kennel for tips on how to train Captain, my black lab mix.

3. How important is philosophy to your writing? Why?

Wasn’t it Plato who had no role for poets in his Republic? So maybe philosophy and poetry don’t really mix well. And Wordsworth and Coleridge were supposed to write the master philosopher-poem, which would save the world, but Coleridge was too busy getting high in India (?) to come up with the philosophy end, leaving Wordsworth to write the Prelude and die, feeling like a failure.

So I’d say that my philosophy is that philosophy shouldn’t mix with my writing.

4. Who are some of your favorite non-Anglo-American writers? Why?
The word “Anglo” always reminds me of “Day-glo.” Probably Pablo Neruda, Rainer Maria Rilke, Arthur Rimbaud, Federico Garcia Lorca… I don’t know. I mostly read British or American poetry.

5. Do you read a lot of poetry? If so, how important is it to your writing?
I’m trying to read more—as evidenced by this blog. It’s important to know what’s been done, what’s being done… I have a lot to learn. And I don’t want to be redundant in my own writing.

6. What is something which your peers/colleagues may assume you've
read but haven't? Why haven't you?
Proust seemed to be the most common answer on “Here Comes Everybody.” I’d have to agree—haven’t read Proust. Or Dostoyevsky. Other stuff just looks more funner.



7. How would you explain what a poem is to my seven year old?

I like Paul Hoover’s second two definitions in this month’s interview:
(B) It’s what you say into the telephone when no one is listening on the other end.
(C) It is a poem if, when they hear it, they will cut themselves shaving.

8. Do you believe in a Role for the Poet? If so, how does it differ from the Role of the Citizen?

Alan Gilbert, in Nov. 2004 said: My point is that just as I don’t walk around calling myself a dishwasher, despite a relatively serious commitment of overall time and energy to the task, I don’t consider myself a poet, either. It may only be when the experience of art is no longer a separate category from everyday life that it has a chance to make a difference, to have a “role.” This doesn’t have to be literal, in the same way that I’m not literally a dishwasher or literally a poet. After all, conceptual art is a serious effort to collapse art into the everyday (as is commodity capitalism, though in a different way: the former fetishizes the intangible, the latter the how-can-I-get-my-hands-on-it?).

In my opinion, the role of the poet is to communicate. To interact with language and culture. Although I agree with Gilbert that it shouldn’t be self-aware.

9. Word associations (the first word which comes to mind; be honest):

Lemon**pie!
Chiseled**gristle
I**Spy
Of**Montreal (new band a friend told me to check out… not bad)
Form**Content

10. What is the relationship between the text and the body in your writing?

Stephen Burt, in Aug. 2005 said: “I hope that relationship varies from poem to poem! In the criticism I don't think there is one-- that is, I'm not conscious of there being one. In the poems, some are meant as visceral, coming from inside the body, from below or beyond obvious rhetoric and logic; some are meant more as performances, with the body and voice of the poet giving a more clearly conscious performance, showing more unity and control.”

I must say that I personally didn’t really understand the question. Text and the body—text on the body? Whether, as Burt suggests, the text has a visceral effect on me? Dickinson said, “If I feel physically as if the top of my head were taken off, I know that is poetry.” Agreed.

http://herecomeseverybody.blogspot.com/